For Authors
Resources for Authors
Academic Journals Are a Lucrative Scam and Were Determined to Change That
The article highlights the issues surrounding academic publishing, particularly the monopoly held by major commercial pu...
Addressing Race and Racism in Editorial Policy
The introduction humorously references a segment by comedian Bill Maher to illustrate the unproven yet strongly held bel...
Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals
The survey of 116 health research journals found that only 35% provided online instructions for peer reviewers, and less...
Ethics in Scientific Publishing: Avoiding Plagiarism and Ensuring Integrity
This article highlights the importance of ethics in scientific publishing, focusing on avoiding plagiarism, ensuring dat...
How Digital Publishing is Radically Changing the Landscape of Scientific Research
Digital publishing is revolutionizing scientific research by enabling faster dissemination, open access, and interdiscip...
Peer Review
The 2019 Peer Review Survey conducted by Sense about Science and Elsevier highlights several key findings. Researchers e...
Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: What it is and How it Works
The article from Visionlearning explains the peer review process, its history, and its role in scientific publishing. It...
So Does the Public Finally Get Peer Review?
The article describes a 10-year collaboration by Sense about Science focused on raising public awareness about the role ...
The Future of Scientific Publishing: 7 Trends to Watch in 2024
This article outlines key trends in scientific publishing for 2024, including the rise of open access, increased use of ...
The Ups and Downs of Peer Review
This article outlines the history and evolution of scientific peer review, starting from the 17th century with the Journ...
The Wiley Network Blog
Explore a wide range of resources for librarians, researchers, educators, students, and professionals. Find Wiley produc...
Tips from a Journal Editor: Being a Good Reviewer
The article by R. Michael Alvarez provides valuable tips for being a good peer reviewer in academic publishing. Key poin...
Research Integrity
This course focuses on research integrity within academic publishing. It provides insights into maintaining ethical stan...
Wiley Research Academy
Wiley Research Academy is an online platform designed to help researchers develop essential skills for successful publis...
Best Practice Guidelines on Research Integrity and Publishing Ethics
These guidelines support researchers, editors, peer reviewers, and others involved in scholarly publishing, providing an...
Checklist for Statistical Assessment of Medical Papers: The CHAMP Statement
The CHAMP (Checklist for Statistical Assessment of Medical Papers) statement addresses the ongoing issue of statistical ...
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) is committed to educating and supporting editors, publishers, universities, resea...
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)
The Institute of Medicine defines healthcare quality as the extent to which services improve health outcomes, aligned wi...
Council of Asian Science Editors (CASE)
The Council of Asian Science Editors (CASE) is focused on improving the quality of scientific research journals in Asia....
EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network
The EQUATOR Network is an international initiative that seeks to improve the reliability and value of published health r...
International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM)
STM is a global organization representing academic publishers, promoting high standards in research communication. Its m...
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)
ICMJE developed these recommendations to review best practices and ethical standards in the conduct and reporting of res...
International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication
The International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication aims to encourage research into the quality and cre...
International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN)
The ISRCTN registry is an internationally recognized clinical trial registry that accepts all clinical research studies,...
Office of Research Integrity (ORI)
The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) oversees Public Health Service (PHS) research integrity activities, excluding FDA...
Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals
ICMJE developed these recommendations to review best practices and ethical standards in the conduct and reporting of res...
Resources for Journal Authors, Editors, and Reviewers (SAGE Publications)
SAGE Publications offers comprehensive resources to support authors, editors, and reviewers. Their Author Gateway provid...
Sense about Science (SAS)
Sense about Science is an independent charity that promotes the public interest in sound science and evidence....
The Journal of Scholarly Publishing (JSP)
The Journal of Scholarly Publishing (JSP) is an essential resource for authors, editors, marketers, and publishers in ac...
Wiley Author Services
This is an author guide outlining the publishing process at Wiley. It provides step-by-step assistance, from finding the...
Wiley Peer Review Policy
The content explains Wileys ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, emphasizing confidentiality, adherence to COPE standa...
ICJME: Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) developed these recommendations to define the author’s ro...
ICJME: Responsibilities in the Submission and Peer-Review Process
These recommendations serve as a guide for authors in understanding their responsibilities in the submissions and peer-r...
ORCID number
An ORCID ID or Open Researcher and Contributor ID is a unique, lifelong digital identifier for you as an author/contribu...
A Focused Toolkit for Journal Editors and Publishers: Building Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) in Editorial Roles and Peer Review
This toolkit aims to enhance diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) in editorial roles and peer review w...
A Guide to Peer Review in Ecology and Evolution, British Ecological Society
The British Ecological Society, the oldest ecological society, has been publishing scientific journals since 1913, begin...
Equitable Peer Review (Indiana University Bloomington)
The Indiana University Bloomington Libraries offer a toolkit for equitable peer review, focusing on reducing bias and im...
How to Survive Peer Review (The British Medical Journal)
This book serves as a practical guide to peer review, helping readers navigate the process effectively, whether as autho...
How-to Guides (Emerald Publishing)
Emerald Publishing offers resources for reviewers that include guidance on becoming a peer reviewer, understanding the p...
Peer Review: How to Get It Right – 10 Tips
Brian Luceys article offers 10 practical tips for writing effective peer reviews. He emphasizes professionalism, constru...
PLOS Review Guidelines
PLOS ONE utilizes a single-anonymized peer review process, where reviewers know the authors identities while their own i...
Sample Peer Review Report
The reviewer provides an extensive critique of the manuscript Sensitivity of hyperspectral narrowband and multispectral ...
Step-by-step Guide to Article Publishing
Springer Nature provides a comprehensive guide for authors looking to publish their research, offering a step-by-step pr...
The Golden Rule of Reviewing
This article discusses the importance of prompt peer review to expedite the publication process. Peer review operates as...
Understanding the Peer Review Process (Taylor & Francis)
The Taylor & Francis guide outlines the peer review process, emphasizing its role in evaluating research quality and pro...
Writing a Journal Manuscript
Publishing your research results is essential for gaining recognition and sharing your ideas with the scientific communi...